Compare And Contrast Sidhartha And Siddhartha - 1025 Words

You go outside on a beautiful sunny day, its gorgeous outside in the daylight you’re enjoying yourself often playing on your own wandering around and you are completely aware of your surroundings. Suddenly it turns pitch black, its nighttime. You’re lost and frightened, completely alone you stumble not completely sure what you are doing. Without the help of a few travelers and your own â€Å"gut† decisions, youre able to make your way back into the light. Like a weight has lifted off of your shoulders and you are freed. Similarly with the story of Siddhartha, by Hermann Hesse, which tells the tale of a young man, Siddhartha, a respected son of a Brahmin who breaks away from traditional way of Ancient India on a journey to find inner peace†¦show more content†¦Hesse personifies the river creating it into a character of its own which also guides Siddhartha down his final steps to salvation. Vasudeva, the ferryman, who sails his ferry across this river is k nown to be an enlightened character he is apart of the river who also guides Siddhartha to find himself and to learn from his travelings that it is one’s own discoveries and travels that influence the mind, soul, and body to become one and at peace to achieve Nirvana, an overall inner and exterior peace. Comparing the River and the Village of Desires is like comparing peanut butter and jelly, separately they have no relations but when you combine them they create something magnificent and something many can relate to. The village, for example, represents a distraction for Siddhartha. This distraction prevents Siddhartha from focusing on his enlightenment journey but also he eventually comes to a realization which helps guide him on the right path again, He had finished with that. That also died in him. He rose, said farewell to the mango tree and the pleasure garden. As he had not had any food that day he felt extremely hungry, and thought of his house in town, of his room an d bed, of the table with food. He smiled wearily, shook his head and said goodbye to these things (68). Siddhartha finally leaves the city, leaving lonely and empty with no wealth, nor lover or any belongings where he realizes he hates the

The History of Neolithic Flax Fiber Processing

should capital punishment be banned - 975 Words

Capital punishment is the death penalty given by the government of a country, to people who have committed hideous crimes like homicide, rape and so on. Death penalty has been a way of punishing people since ages. Although there are some countries that have abolished death penalty from their law, there are still many which still practise the act of killing a person for crime. Death penalty is prevalent in the US, Asian and Middle Eastern countries. Some of the ways of executing criminals are hanging, shooting, electrocution and giving lethal injections. People have different opinions on the issue of death penalty given to a convict. While some think that death penalty is necessary for those who have committed a terrible crime, there are†¦show more content†¦Hence, it is best to avoid executing a person. For instance, the controversial Timothy Evans case is regarded as a major miscarriage of justice, which eventually led to the abolition of capital punishment in the UK in 196 5. Moreover, capital punishment is not always just and appropriate. Usually, it has been seen that poor people have to succumb to death penalty as they cannot afford good lawyers to defend their stance. There are very rare cases of rich people being pronounced a death penalty. Also, an individual from minority communities are more likely to be given death penalty. Finally, it is reported that there is no relation between death penalty and crime rate, that is, giving death penalty does not decrease crime rate in the society. Crimes are prevalent in countries where death penalty exists and where it has been abolished. Therefore, the deterring factor associated to capital punishment is heavily questioned by opponents, who claim that life imprisonment is much better, where the criminals could be made to muse over their crimes for the rest of their lives, instead of having quick relief from being executed. Based on the above discussion, the question whether death penalty is a moral or an immoral act in a cultured society, does not have a definite answer. Whether to give death penalty to a criminal or not, may depend on his earlier criminal records and the seriousness of the crime he has committed. Hence,Show MoreRelatedCapital Punishment Should Be Banned1515 Words   |  7 Pages Capital punishment has been a part of the nation’s history as it dates back to the British North American colonies. Capital punishment was also used as a way to remove those prosecuted for being â€Å"witches† during the famous Salem Witch Trials. These days the use of the death penalty has become an anachronism. In recent times has capital punishment become a place for argument to those supporting and those opposing the death penalty. Capital punishment should be federally banned for its inconsistenciesRead MoreCapital Punishment Should Not Be Banned1581 Words   |  7 Pages Capital punishmen t needs to be banned in California because it is morally wrong, it violates the constitution and it can cost the lives of innocent people. The death penalty is a legal punishment of execution when a capital crime has been committed. In the United States, there are 41 capital offenses that are legally punishable by death. The death penalty dates back to various centuries ago and it is still used in today’s world. Each year, thousands of people are put on death row for an averageRead MoreShould Capital Punishment Be Banned? Essay1788 Words   |  8 Pagespractices capital punishment. Americans pride themselves on living in the country that they believe does nothing wrong in terms of punishing those who commit heinous crimes. Unfortunately, that innocent image of America happens not to be true. Over 160 members of the United Nations (U.N.) have already banned capital punishment including the entirety of the European Union (E.U.). Even the Universal Declaration of Human Rights c laims that capital punishment is wrong; therefore, punishment via deathRead MoreShould Capital Punishment Be Banned?908 Words   |  4 PagesRecently, in Oklahoma, 43 year old Clayton Lockett underwent a botched process for Capitol punishment. Although, according to the associated press, Governor Mary Fallin agrees that execution is the appropriate punishment for the most horrendous crimes, executions have been stopped until new protocol and procedure has been implemented. This unfortunate incident has brought back to light the issues behind the death penalty. Problems with current methods have become apparent and secondary methods doRead MoreCapital Punishment Should Not Be Banned2007 Words   |  9 Pages â€Å"An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind; or does it?† Capital punishment, or the death penalty as is more commonly known, should not be, but, is a contemporary problem in the United States. Most of the entire world today has abolished the death penalty. However, there are still many states within the U.S. that still exercise this form of punishment. The most preferred method of execution which is exercised by more than 35 states in the U.S. Is lethal injection. Many countries today likeRead MoreCapital Punishment Should Not Be Banned1773 Words   |  8 Pagesdecades capital punishment has been a controversial debate on whether it should be used for convicted felons or not. Some believe it is the right way to finally have justice and end crime while, others believe it is inhumane and considered murder. Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the process of ending one’s life through different execution methods. Capital punishment is a cruel and unusua l way of ending someone’s life when they could be in prison for life. Capital punishment is expensiveRead MoreCapital punishments should not be banned; people believe capital punishment is unconstitutional,900 Words   |  4 PagesCapital punishments should not be banned; people believe capital punishment is unconstitutional, that the person on death row actually committed a crime that put them there. There are complaints about the money put out for capital punishment and some think that the death penalty sends the wrong message or that our government is broken. Even though people believe capital punishment should be banned, it should not be banned due to multiple reasons. In the United States, capital punishment (also knownRead MoreImagine Having A Criminal, Who Has Escaped From Multiple1663 Words   |  7 Pagespowerful and has lots of money. What should happen to this extremely dangerous criminal when he is caught again? This is where capital punishment would come into play. Some people say the capital punishment should not be banned in any U. S. state and many people say capital punishment should be federally banned. However, both sides would agree they want a safe society and that crime should have a punishment. A common misconception about capital punishment is that people think it is murder; thisRead MoreBanning Capital Punishment in the United States Essay1187 Words   |  5 PagesBanning the use of capital punishment in the United States Capital punishment (the death penalty) is a legal procedure which is known as the most severe punishment where the law authorizes execution as a punishment for criminals (Gerald, 2008). Many people claim that allowing such a punishment will help decrease the crime rate, and also give closure to the victim’s family, but if you as American citizens analyze this situation in more detail you can see that taking a life for taking a life is moreRead MoreBenefits Of The Death Penalty Essay1295 Words   |  6 PagesOne of the most debated issues, whether capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, should be banned or still be used, is still a widely disputed issue at the heart of political debate. Many states recently have been abolishing capital punishment. Yet, as of October 2014, support for capital punishment is still strong as three fifths of Americans continue to back capital punishment. It is important that capital punishment is included as a punishment for all viole nt criminals for it can be

Violence And Nonviolence Essay Example For Students

Violence And Nonviolence Essay Violence is a problem that we as humans, deal with everyday. Today, it seemsthat we deal with it in just about every aspect of our lives. From childrenscartoons to the nightly news, we are witnesses to its power and harm. A highlydebated argument for the causes of violence are surrounding our homes as well asour government. No matter the causes of violence or for that fact aggressors, wehave a personal responsibility must be taken for violent actions. We are giventhe choice to decide how we each want to live our lives; but before we decide,we must look at the ethical issues that surround our choices. Most humans striveto live a good, pure life. Violence is one of the few instances that destroysthat good life. It is something that we work towards eliminating. It is definedas an act taken against another being with the intent to do harm. We oftenconsider violence in terms of the physical aggressor, yet violence can surfacein a variety of ways even including self-defense. Violence is a result ofconflicting interests or unresolvable differences. In most instances, bothparties to he conflict feel that they are right and that their actions arejustified. However, there are other cases in which their is a clear aggressorand victim. Nevertheless, violence is a very complicated and difficult issue. Byits very nature, violence is an act against life. Life, is sacred. It ischerished, not out of purpose of use, not instrumental, but for the good,intrinsic value of its very being. Violence is instrumental. It is a means to anend. There is no intrinsical goodness in violence. Violent acts are not good forthe sake of violence itself. A single question that arises out of the argumentof violence and nonviolence, Is violence ever justifiable or acceptable. The twomain types of arguments that arise are the self-defense paradigm and pacifism. The self-defense paradigm accepts violence as a means to protect ones life,or the life of others. This argument interprets life as being intrinsically goodand for instrumental purposes, but accepts lethal results as an unintendedconsequence of defense. Pacifism argues that violence is never acceptable. Because violence is an instrumental act, it undermines and disrespects humanlife as a cherished entity. Upon first evaluation of these arguments, Ipreferred the self-defense paradigm. I believe I am more of a realist. I thoughtthat violence was inevitable. No matter the strategy, violence is going to bethe end result. However, by the end of the semester, I have discoveredsomething. The whole purpose of pacifism is to change the fact that violence isinevitable. It is a movement that teaches humans how to deal with the situationsthat inevitably end in violence. It is a way to defend life from aggressivethreats. The pacifist may never risk killing his opponent, regardless of theconsequences. At all times, they must be respectful and compassionate of life. Ibelieve that I have changed my view because I have a greater understanding ofpacifism. At first, I thought that it was the easy way out. It was the way totake to avoid a situation; no matter the situation, never be violent. Ithought o f issues such as wars or if someone was trying to kill you or yourfamily. How could someone not do anything? It was a weak persons answer tothe argument. Then, out of the blue, it struck me. We are always talking aboutbettering the world, getting rid of violence. Well, we are imitativecreatures. We do what we see. How are the younger generation of people going tobe nonviolent when all they see is violence. If, we dont start demonstratingnonviolent, peaceful acts, what are they going to imitate? We are presentingself-defense as an excuse. It is justifiable but only if you dont intend tokill the other person. This can be a very risky situation. When defendingyourself or someone else, you are allowed violence as long as you didnt meanto kill the aggressor? What happens when you cant decipher the aggressor?Nothing should be taken away from the self-defense philosophy. It isunderstandable and ethical. It would be hard not to defend yourself from anattacker, or to help a loved one. But, i t just seems to me that in todaysworld, we must reevaluate our morals. Self-defense takes the idea that life isintrinsically good and should never be violated. It adds that life should neverbe violated but in certain cases. It seems like a double standard. Pacifism is amovement to take a stand against violence. It is giving violent situations achance of reversal. However, the choice of pacifism is a lifelong commitment. .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .postImageUrl , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:hover , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:visited , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:active { border:0!important; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:active , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Telemachus And Penelope EssayOne can not be a part time pacifist or a selective supporter of just wars. Thatis, one can not condemn violence, but when violent becomes a personal situation,find an excuse. The same in just wars. All wars must be unjust, not just some. Pacifism is a strong moral stand. It is dedication to preserving human life, nomatter the situation. A pacifist would have to take a stand which would notallow him to violently defended himself or others in any situation. Pacifism isdescribed as the higher calling because it witnesses the grandness andbeauty of being alive. Though the self-defense paradigm is a wonderfularguments, I think it contains a few discrepancies. There should be no excusefor harming another human being. Just because someone else started it, doesntmake it right or O.K. Philosophy